Not a lot of people liking President O’s greenwashing of nukes. This most excellent article in the Guardian dispels the myth that nukes are green.
The argument that nuclear is “carbon-free” conveniently omits the entire process of mining uranium, which produces greenhouse gases, along with other pollutants. In Virginia, where a study has just been commissioned to determine its safety, uranium is mined in open pits. This destroys topsoil and increases runoff, which contaminates drinking water with cancer-causing toxins.
The uranium-enrichment process also emits greenhouse gases and is highly wasteful. Eighty percent of the ore that goes through the enrichment process ends up as waste. And this is to say nothing of the lye, sulfuric acid, and other caustic agents that must be used to turn the uranium into reactor-ready fuel.
While on the surface, the steam billowing from the cooling tower of a nuclear reactor is less harmful than the toxic smoke that spews from a coal plant, nuclear reactors still create byproducts that are dangerous to human health and welfare. There’s also the huge problem of radioactive nuclear waste, which can stay hot for hundreds of thousands of years. Storing the radioactive waste isn’t just a security threat; there’s potential for radioactive chemicals to leak, as they are in Vermont and at other aging reactors around the country.
It’s clear to me that the US Prezzie doesn’t read P’n’P. Perhaps you could invite him to do so via this handy form?
The folks at nuclear news have that article available, as well as a fantastic sidebar, The Very Secret Costs of Nuclear Power. From their site:
Well it is impossible for anyone to estimate the real costs of nuclear power, as only a narrow range of costs are discussed, even where the nuclear industry is supposedly privately owned.
1. The nuclear weapons industry is so connected with nuclear power, and the costs on the nuclear weapons industry are huge.
2. Where the nuclear industry is state owned – e.g. in France, Russia, China, South Korea, taxation, and the costs of electricity are manipulated, and figures given out for nuclear costs are not really reliable.
Secrecy about the nuclear industry is essential anyway, for security reasons. But it is also convenient, as no-one really knows how much it costs for state-owned nuclear facilities to manage nuclear waste. Well, there are ‘cheap’ options used, as we learn from time, with nuclear waste dumping occurring secretly, and without regard for the environment or the people, (usually poor communities, indigenous and rural people.) Eventually someone has to pay for the long-term costs.
Back at home, the nukers are bragging about their exploration in Quebec’s Otish Mountains.
Ditem Explorations /quotes/comstock/11v!dit (CA:DIT 0.08, 0.00, 0.00%) is pleased to report that the 2010 exploration program on the Company’s Otish Mountains uranium property in Quebec is underway. A fully operational camp has been established to accommodate geophysical and drilling crews. Drilling on the first hole began yesterday.
They don’t get that they’re involved in ecological racism. And that sux! The Quebec no-nukers have been working tirelessly to put an end to nuking the environment. Check it out. And here’s a thorough piece from the Dominion about the nuke activity in northern Quebec.
One further focus for criticism is the province’s much-hyped development strategy, known as the “Plan Nord,” which involves targeting government money at selected infrastructure projects favouring principally the resource extraction sector in northern Quebec. According to research conducted by The Dominion, last year’s provincial budget earmarked $130 million for extending Highway 167 by 268km into the Otish Mountains, northeast of the James Bay Cree town of Mistissini. It is in an area without residential communities, but where Vancouver-based Strateco Resources has discovered some of Quebec’s most concentrated uranium deposits.
Finally, here’s another story about Canada’s outrageous and extravagant spending on AECL flowing from the Chalk River Fiasco.
As a result, Ottawa allocated $824-million in the current fiscal year to the problem-plagued nuclear flagship as the government prepares to restructure it and sell its commercial division, according to supplemental estimates released late yesterday.
That’s a 50-per-cent increase from federal spending on AECL in the prior fiscal year. In today’s budget, Finance Minister Jim Flaherty will likely provide hundreds of millions more to support AECL’s operating budget and design work on the advanced Candu reactor and refurbish Chalk River laboratories.
Our tax dollars are being sunk into what the PM himself called a “sinkhole” so that the feds can sell it for next to nothing? WTF? It seems that PMS definitely needs to hear from you on this ridiculous, costly venture! Imagine, were that kind of money to be spent on real green technology…
Politics'n'Poetry 
I was in France in the early 90s. On a trip down the Rhone river I saw there were many nuclear power plant ….. but I read later that they all were severely cut back in the production. It was one of the warmest summer on record and the cooling water they drew from the river was too warm to accomplish its’ intended cooling.
As well, when they did do their job the raised the temperature of the river with their effluent and were radically changing the ecological balance there.
Even in operation these ‘clean’ things can and do change the environment.
(sorry for the grammar and typing errors) OOPS!
The point on using a lot of water and heat pollution is well taken. Secrecy ? Heck, I think back in 1954 you’d be lucky to know we Had a reactor at Chalk River, let alone know anything about it. It was declared a ‘hands off’ topic for the press for years under the guise of national security.
So these days we have old way obsolete equipment that people didn’t know was trash but were getting nuclear medicine from : ‘were’ being the operative word.
Maybe we should get together with Ahnadinejad and see what we can work out. Think the US would go for that after all their decades of drivel about Iran while trying to rip it apart ?
Anyway. I’ve been collecting some of your info for years. Do you have a cache besides the blog where you organize the high points like this ? http://opitslinkfest.blogspot.com/2009/08/uranium-mining-and-depleted.html
The following time I read a weblog, I hope that it doesnt disappoint me as much as this one. I mean, I do know it was my option to read, however I truly thought youd have something attention-grabbing to say. All I hear is a bunch of whining about one thing that you possibly can repair in the event you werent too busy on the lookout for attention.