Federal Cuts: Impact on Women

My inbox is filled with statements from women’s groups regarding the impact of the Harper’s decisions around the Status of Women Canada cuts. Here are a couple of them.

First, from the Newfoundland – Labrador Provincial Advisory Council on the Status of Women (not available online):

Federal Conservatives Betray Commitments to Women’s Equality:Provincial Advisory Council Responds to Cuts to Status of Women Canada

September 26, 2006

The Provincial Advisory Council on the Status of Women is alarmed by the federal government’s decision to cut 1 billion dollars in spending. “The federal government signaled its intention to make these cuts last spring, and our worst fears are being realized,” says Leslie MacLeod, President. “They are eliminating 1% of their overall spending by
eliminating or reducing critical social programs.”

The Advisory Council denounces the decision to cut the federal Department of Status of Women Canada by $5 million over two years. These cuts will be taken from its modest budget of $13 million per year. It is one of the smallest federal departments but has a huge role in advancing women’s equality. This department provides critical analysis of the effect of policies and programs on women.

Prior to the 2006 federal election, Stephen Harper stated to Canadian women that: “If elected, I will take concrete and immediate measures, as recommended by the United Nations, to ensure that Canada fully upholds its commitments to women in Canada.” However, yesterday’s cuts are proof that the Prime Minister has no intention of upholding his commitments to Canadian women.

According to Ms. MacLeod: “The reduction in funding to Status of Women Canada and the elimination of the Court Challenges Program of Canada, along with other social spending cuts, fly in the face of recommendations made by equality-seeking groups and the United Nations. This is certainly not what Canadian women or the United Nations
Committee on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women had in mind.”

And from the Canadian Feminist Alliance for International Action, FAFIA:

Cuts to Status of Women and Court Challenges Program

Undermine Government’s Commitment to Women’s Equality

September 25, 2006


Ottawa: FAFIA, a pan-Canadian alliance of women’s and human rights organizations, is denouncing the $5 million cut to the federal department of Status of Women over two years. These cuts will be taken from its modest annual budget of $13 million. The grants and contributions arm ($11 million) of the department was not affected.

“These cuts will critically affect the federal government’s own capacity to live up to its equality commitments to women,” said Shelagh Day, Co-Chair of the Canadian Feminist Alliance for International Action (FAFIA).

FAFIA is also dismayed by the elimination of the Court Challenges Program. “This Program has provided Canadian women with their only access to the use of their constitutional equality rights,” said Shelagh Day. “Equality rights have no meaning in Canada if women, and other Canadians who face discrimination, cannot use them.”

“Constitutional cases are too expensive for women to mount on their own. Without this test case fund, women simply do not have access to the courts when their rights are violated.”

During the last federal election campaign, Stephen Harper promised to “take concrete and immediate measures…to ensure that Canada fully upholds its commitments to women.” These cuts are not consistent with Mr. Harper’s election promise,” said Day

Status of Women Canada is responsible for equipping the federal government to conduct gender based analysis of all policies and programs. It also provides internal expertise on specific policy initiatives. The department’s budget is one of the smallest of any department at the federal level.

An Expert Panel on accountability mechanisms for gender equality, that made its report just before the last federal election, concluded that Status of Women Canada needed to be significantly strengthened in order to better perform its function as a watchdog for women’s equality. The cut to SWC ignores those crucial recommendations.

Whomever suggested that the Harper was Bush Lite was wrong. This is Bush Heavy.


3 thoughts on “Federal Cuts: Impact on Women

  1. Steve cut child care so no big surprise he’s cutting women off. As for constitutional cases, he’s also cut the legal fund because, as he said, why should we give money to lawyers so that they can challenge the laws of our parliament?

    I guess if he can sleep at night with the blood of Lebanese mothers and kids on his hands, he won’t lose any sleep over UN criticism of Canada’s failure to protect women, kids, natives and iliterates.

    The politics in this country is very discouraging at the moment. Liberals are all Harper lite. NDP and Green are only running for opposition. I think it’s time for a grand, however futile, gesture. Maybe a “Stay-at-home-Mom day” once a week, when every woman stays home to look after the kids, the husband, the parents – or just herself – instead of going out to work or school or volunteer. It would effectively shut down the economy for one day every week until we get some repect! A voluntary, Talibanesque strike against the guys and gals who think child care etc. isn’t an important issue. That women shouldn’t have the right to choose.

    What do you think?


  2. A sad day for women, poor people, aboriginals, the environment… and for what? A conservative talking point.

    It might interest readers to know PM “Steve” also cut 12Million in funding for pine beetle prevention, which up to now has been kept in check at the rocky mountains. Failure to continue to keep them from spreading ensures that our national parks and one of the worlds largest boreal forests from severe damage.

    Ask Rona or your favourite Member of Parliament how this is supposed to be good for the environment. The fact is, sadly, that conservatives will *always* cut funding to groups where they don’t recieve support – regardless of the consequences. I’ve seen it in BC, Alberta, Ontario and Federally time and time again. The difference this time is it is coming from a group of petulant, partisan hacks who are barely capable of forming any thought beyond what PM “Steve” tells them to.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s