The Clean Air Act was a waste of our tax money, unless the parties in Opposition can do something with it. Ambrose must be listening closely to what her family’s big oil and big ass big gas friends said as she formulated the death of our children’s future.
I am one who worked towards women’s reproductive freedom in the 80′s. I rejoiced in Justice Bertha Wilson’s words in the Supreme Court decision that overturned the Criminal Code of Canada restrictions on abortion in 1988. I am greatly disheartened that May and the Green Party of Canada have re-opened this issue. Though they spout a (weak) pro-choice policy, they — and May, in particular — appear to have no respect for my right to control my body.
Furthermore, try as she might to do otherwise in in her response to Rebick, May makes a religious argument, not a moral one. And Canada, thank goodness, has managed to keep the Church and the State separate. Shouldn’t we try to keep it that way?
I have to wonder if the socially conservative will ever find peace. Is it not clear that so long as we have a society where children are considered a liability, where women are abused and mistreated simply because they are women, where the wages for parking lot attendants are more than childcare workers, where isms abound, there can be no discussion around abortion?
May’s talk to the Catholic nuns, it seems to me, was nothing more than politicking, vote-grabbing. Now she’s back-peddling. And, by recording her talk and broadcasting it, the Green Party of Canada has opened their doors to social Conservatives looking for a new home. Even more politicking and vote-grabbing. And, as always, it’s on the backs of women, at the expense of hard-won women’s rights.
I am appalled, not only with May, but also with myself, for thinking that she could make a difference for women in Canada, for thinking I could support the Green Party of Canada. Hah! It’s just more of the same-old, same-old.
Well, until you turn to the provincial Greens where the Leader, Sandra Finley, is a pro-choice feminist, no ifs, ands, buts, or maybes about it.
The President and Vice-Chancellor of the University of Regina today delivered a fine gift to students and staff. Dr. Robert E. Hawkins resigned! Faculty and students at the U of R had been mumbling for several months about the severe right turn the Administration had taken since Hawkins arrival. The rumour mill was ripe with talk of no research money, no way meaning that unless a program was revenue-generating, then it was on the chopping block. That might be good news for Admin and Engineering, but in a liberal arts institution, well, it’s ludicrous!
Release: December 21, 2006 Contact: Stephen King, External Relations E-mail: Stephen.King@uregina.ca
Phone: (306) 585.5632 Mobile: (306) 536.4312
Fax: (306) 585.4997
Leadership change at the University of Regina Dr. Robert E. Hawkins today announced that he has resigned from the position of president and vice-chancellor of the University of Regina effective immediately.
Hawkins said, “In view of differences of opinion on management philosophy and other issues, I have decided to resign as president of the University. I remain a professor at the University and look forward to serving the University and its students in that capacity in the future.”
“The Board of Governors appreciates the keen interest that Dr. Hawkins has shown in his emphasis on providing a quality student experience and his drive to develop programs that will appeal to the students we need to recruit,” said chair of the University’s Board of Governors, Mo Bundon. “We need to be onside with each other, and we have agreed that a change is an appropriate move.”
I emailed my MP, Dave Batters, regarding my concerns about democracy for farmers within the Canadian Wheat Board — this was before Minister Strahl fired the CEO, Adrian Measner. The arrogance of these men and women irks me to no end! They act as if they have formed a majority government, with no respect for democracy or democratic processes. They’re fascists!
What follows is the response I received from Batters:
Thank you for contacting my office regarding the Canadian Wheat Board.
As you are aware, on January 23, 2006, Canadians voted for change. The
Conservative Party campaigned on the promise of marketing choice for
western Canadian wheat and barley producers. The Honourable Chuck
Strahl, Minister of Agriculture, has released the findings and
recommendations of a Task Force on implementing marketing choice.
The Task Force recommends a four-stage transition from a Canadian Wheat
Board (CWB) with monopoly powers, to a marketing choice environment
* preparing for change;
* forming the new CWB;
* launching the new CWB with transition measures; and
* post transition.
The Task Force concluded that a new CWB, owned by farmers, could thrive
and create value without monopoly selling powers. Please be assured
that our government is carefully examining the Task Force's findings and
is listening to what western Canadian grain farmers have to say about
the ideas put forward in the report.
Our Conservative government is committed to delivering a plan which
offers Western farmers marketing choice and a strong, viable, and
voluntary farmer-owned Canadian Wheat Board that works for everyone.
Minister Strahl has announced the federal government's intention to hold
a plebiscite in the New Year on the issue of marketing choice for
western Canadian barley producers. This plebiscite demonstrates that we
are listening to the opinions of farmers on this important issue.
Western Canadian wheat and barley farmers produce a world-class product
and our Conservative government sees a bright future for producers with
a voluntary Wheat Board.
Thank you for sharing your thoughts on this issue with me. As your
Member of Parliament, it is important for me to hear the views of my
Member of Parliament - Palliser
Moose Jaw: (306) 691-3577 Toll-free: 1-866-691-3577
Regina: (306) 790-4646 e-mail: email@example.com
Ottawa: (613) 992-9115 www.davebatters.com
As we move into the winter, Politics’n’Poetry wishes you light and love.
This Holy Space
In ruffles as supple as satin, a small space hangs,
suspended mid-air in the middle of the room. Unbelievably real,
this curiousity of curves perplexes, beckons, teases
her consciousness, presenting only when her mind is calm,
when she is prepared, only when she knows the window
beyond the folds of here-and-now hides behind,
only when her focus is just so, her body
nothing more than cells curving into the fabric.
Only then can she draw back the curtain,
open herself to the bright light beyond the ruff.
She gathers courage, wraps it ‘round her
like a shawl, and steps through. Her feet,
first one, then the other, tingle with a pulse
that moves up into her calves where it thickens,
rises to her thighs, then up to her Yoni centre
and through and up again to that place of individuation,
climbing still upward to the beat of her aching heart,
and up through the breath of her love and up again
through the power of voice and higher still
through wisdom and thought and finally
up and out through the crown of glory shimmering
around and down in a shower of light and colour.
Oh, she is whole!
Oh, she is beginning!
Yes, the day is fast approaching when we are all asked to send the good energy of orgasm out into the world! Tomorrow, December 22, is Global Orgasm Day! They have a blog, too. Now, before you go thinking this is a bunch of hokey, well, think about it. I mean, even if you don’t believe it will change anything, it’ll be fun, right? Enjoy!
WHO? All Men and Women, you and everyone you know.
WHERE? Everywhere in the world, but especially in countries with weapons of mass destruction.
WHEN? Winter Solstice Day – Friday, December 22nd, at the time of your choosing, in the place of your choosing and with as much privacy as you choose.
WHY? To effect positive change in the energy field of the Earth through input of the largest possible surge of human energy a Synchronized Global Orgasm.
First, the comments that follow are focused on the federal wing of the New Democratic Party. The federal and provincial wings are two very different kettles of fish!
Second, I’ve tried to stay out of the flak going on in the blogosphere and in the media about the NDP. The party, like all organizations of human beings, has issues. And, truth be told, I have serious concerns about the strategies, communications policy and messaging of the NDP since before the last election. It’s as though the inner circle has lost touch with the grassroots — not the Party’s grassroots, but the grassroots from which Leader Jack Layton comes. The sense I get is that rude children are running the show and that’s not good for the Leader, for the Party or for Canada. I would urge Jack to ground into his roots as an activist and lead from there.
Third, in light of all this, The Jurist over at Accidental Deliberations has invited responses to Why Canada needs the NDP? And it’s a good question, one I’ve pondered all day. My answer for me is simple. Canada needs the NDP because it is the only federal political party that recognizes a woman’s fundamental right to reproductive choice. Not only that, it will insist that all New Democratic Members of Parliament toe the line when the issue is addressed by the House of Commons.
Suffice it to say that Canada needs the NDP because Canadian women can count on the NDP to stand up and be counted when it matters.